User blog comment:Fire InThe Hole/Fire disappearifies./@comment-26353693-20160512200234/@comment-1917722-20160513062137

Whoa whoa GC, this was not directly directed against you seeing as he was simply making an example. An infuriated person isn't necessarily pissed at the one specific person they mention. As to incorporating Delinius into larger plots: the last time I tried that, I got a general vibe that 'things were already settled'. True, this was before timelines - yet why has Hank to date been the only one who I've actively discussed incorporation of each other's characters into our (planned) works? Either way, if you ask me for communication, you'll get it and I'll begin offering a dozen possible 'incorporation' suggestions. That, and I hope that the relevant writing people actually see that which I offer up. On top of that I've probably stated "feel free to suggest new ideas and/or alterations" on multiple things - I agree, most of you haven't read my subpages and blogs extensively, but you can't say I tried (though there was one time when Mori made a great suggestion regarding the Wau timeline).

Listen, I know very well there's a difference between being good buddies and favouritism and I understand that only the former is the case here. But take a look at how it appears. Close buddies and playing favourites can seem awfully similar, and you need to understand that a pissed person does not differ the two from each other, simply because that's not how that works.

I do not want an escalation of this.