User:Look-a-troopa/Pets/Mk. III


 * HS aa7900 (Arguably Mk. IV, if you consider Mk. II and Mk. II.5 (II.v?) to be different enough, but I didn't want to make a Nature Mk. IV for this naming convention to work.)

So, I've decided to remake my pet page, since while I think there's a certain elegance to the minimalist -reliant design, it's really no longer working for me. As of this moment, I haven't landed on any particular design yet, so here's where I'll experiment and study a bit.

Previous Iterations
II.v II.5 : 0811, 2016 - 0209, 2019
 * [[File:Nature.png]] Mk. I: 0601, 2012 - 0904, 2012
 * I don't think I want to go back to sorting pets by their taxonomy like this, though I did at least include the genotypes next to their names.
 * [[File:Nature Mark II.PNG]] Mk. II: 0929, 2012 - 1120, 2012
 * Much more orderly than before, though it leaves the front page looking kind of dull. The pet list became out-of-date very quickly.
 * [[File:Nature (Mark II½).png]] Mk.
 * Added the pet images after not touching the front page for almost 4 years. For some reason, I didn't think to put the genotype markers back.

Checklist

 * Add Akyl laileb, Ruscell, Reglar Brocoly, Vuteria's Salad Cloak, and any other outstanding pets I'm forgetting about.
 * Figure out what to do with Mfpn84/q8h8xK, if anything.
 * Include all relevant information I can find to every pet's profile, meaning:
 * Full description
 * Genotype(s)
 * Relationship(s)
 * Creator
 * Previous owner(s)
 * Track record
 * Pet Arena participation
 * Wonder Jungle visits
 * Drowsy Stumps salary
 * Story appearances

Spaghetti at the Wall

 * Sliding pet parade
 * As attempted here, although the use of MediaWiki pages is very difficult at present (I do not have permission to edit them). Also, the parade seems to have broken?
 * Family trees
 * Mentioned here. The code (or the documentation around it) is difficult to penetrate, thanks in no small part to Wikipedia's templates getting increasingly more complex over nearly two decades. It's still the MediaWiki engine, though, so we should be able to reverse-engineer it somehow.