User blog comment:A, Mori/Should We Rethink The Classpect Titles?/@comment-16075172-20160422174214/@comment-16075172-20160423173056

Though I talk about this stuff in confidence, I can't say that I know 100% about whether the information on it is reliable or not; I'm just working off of the available information and compiling it into a "this is the plethora of things pertaining to what this probably is". Tho I'm confident enough to say the information is at least around 75% accurate

The Classes consist of Active and Passive classes; an active class has a passive counterpart, vice versa. All classes are basically about what they do with their aspect and how they do it, what challenges they have with their aspect, etc. Paired classes are just a passive and active class that are like pretty much the same "given definition" part of it; i.e. Rogue and Thief (passive and active) are paired classed; the Rogue steals and shares the aspect, and the Thief only steals the aspect. This isn't to say that some classes can't have the same abilities tho, and a person's abilities pertaining to their aspect aren't limited by just what their title says they can do


 * The Heir (Passive; "One who Invites Manipulation of X or one who Invites Manipulation through X) naturally gravitates towards their Aspect, both in literal and symbolic forms of it. They have huge amounts of aspect-related strength. The challenge of a Heir is to not get stuck on one thing-- to know when to move on and adapt.
 * The Mage (Active; "One who Understands with X or Understands X") experiences their aspect uniquely, in ways both good and bad. As a result, they gain a unique understanding of what their aspect is or does. The challenge of a Mage is to become open to new insight or different perspectives than just their own.

I sort of found both the Heir of Light and the Mage of Light to be fitting for Delinius, tho I guess it's more up to you as for what you decide